Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

Clinical Research: Constipation Sections
Author Biography
Introduction
What is constipation?
Understanding the problem
Objective Measurement
Subjective Measurement
Measuring Components
Precipitating Factors
Therapeutic Comparisons
Research Questions
Currently Selected Section: Conclusion




Chapter 3: Methods for Clinical Research in Constipation: Conclusion
 

What conclusion can be drawn from these results about the effectiveness of the three laxatives?

You answered:

Selection BThe beneficial effects of the combination laxative were due to improved colonic transit time.

INCORRECT

The combination laxative appears to be the most effective in that it was associated with significantly fewer patients with continuing constipation at the end of the trial than either the softening agent or the bulking laxative. The combination laxative also produced the greatest increase in bowel movement frequency, although it did not reach statistical significance. These results might have been achieved by the use of larger amounts of the combined laxative than either the softener or bulking laxative, but in fact the volumes of the combined laxative consumed were significantly less than those of either of the other two preparations, especially the bulking laxative. The very large volume of the latter was due to the need to take at least 150 ml of water with each dose of bulking agent. The combined laxative is thus not only more effective but also more potent on a volume basis. How such a clinical response correlates with effects on transit time cannot be known as no such measures were included in the trial.


        Back to Question