Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

 

Temporomandibular Disorders
Author Bios
Introduction
Epidemiology
Population Perspective
Developmental Perspective
Ecological Perspective
Epidemiologic Measures
Currently selected section: Defining a Case
Pain Location
Pain Frequency, Duration and Severity
Recency of Pain
Ambient Pain or Pain on Function?
Clinical Signs and Symptoms
Pain Impact/Disability
Co-morbidity
Choosing an Appropriate Design
Cross-sectional Surveys
Longitudinal Studies
Case-control Studies
Prospective Designs
Preventive and Clinical Trials
Clinical Epidemiology
Practical Considerations
Sample Size
Standardizing Data Collection
Response Burden
Summary

 

Chapter 26: Studying the Epidemiology of Temporomanibular Disorders: Defining a Case
          

Because the aims of epidemiology are to estimate the proportion of people with a certain condition (i.e. determine prevalence) or to enumerate onsets of the condition (i.e. determine incidence) or to discover risk factors for the condition, deciding who should be counted as a case is central to conducting epidemiologic studies.

For some conditions, case definition is relatively straightforward and relies on testing a biological sample (e.g. a biopsy specimen or a bacterial culture) or on observing specific clinical signs (e.g. fever with a characteristic rash). However, for conditions where pain is a central defining characteristic, a number of issues related to case definition must be considered. These include issues related to measuring pain by self report and deciding on thresholds for symptom severity and duration.

Definition of Pain
The International Association for the Study of Pain defines pain as "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage" (Mersky and Bogduk, 1994)

Since experience is, by definition, individual and subjective, case definitions of pain conditions must rely, at least in part, on self report measures. Many lay persons, as well as beginning pain researchers and clinicians, are uncomfortable with this reliance on self report. "Isn't everyone's pain different?" "Pain seems so subjective!" and "How can you study something so unreliable?" are comments frequently heard. Despite these misgivings, texts on the measurement of pain (e.g. Turk and Melzack, 2001) indicate that certain self report measures, including simple verbal descriptor scales and numerical rating scales, have acceptable degrees of reliability (reproducibility) and validity (i.e. measure what they are intended to measure).

Researchers can enhance the reliability of pain measurement by increasing the clarity and specificity of the questions asked. This is accomplished by using standardized questions that are easily understood by people of all educational levels and that are highly specific in terms of pain location, pain severity, frequency, and duration of pain, and the time period covered by the question. In addition, in arriving at case definitions, self report measures may be supplemented by data on behavior (e.g. work disability) and clinical signs. But by definition, pain is a subjective experience. At this time, the most valid method of assessing pain is by self report.

Page 11 of 44
      Previous Section