Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

 

Temporomandibular Disorders
Author Bios
Introduction
Epidemiology
Population Perspective
Developmental Perspective
Ecological Perspective
Currently selected section: Epidemiologic Measures
Defining a Case
Pain Location
Pain Frequency, Duration and Severity
Recency of Pain
Ambient Pain or Pain on Function?
Clinical Signs and Symptoms
Pain Impact/Disability
Co-morbidity
Choosing an Appropriate Design
Cross-sectional Surveys
Longitudinal Studies
Case-control Studies
Prospective Designs
Preventive and Clinical Trials
Clinical Epidemiology
Practical Considerations
Sample Size
Standardizing Data Collection
Response Burden
Summary

 

Chapter 26: Studying the Epidemiology of Temporomanibular Disorders: Epidemiologic Measures
          

What is epidemiology good for?

Epidemiology provides a scientific basis for preventing or ameliorating disease and disability on a population basis. Table 5.1 lists eight types of scientific and public health research activities encompassed in epidemiologic investigation (Morris, 1975; Von Korff et al., 1992a).

Table 6.1 Uses of Epidemiology as Applied to TMD Pain
Establishing the dimensions of morbidity and mortality as a function of person, place and time.A survey to determine the percent of adults in the non-institutionalized civilian US population with “pain more than once in the jaw joint or in front of the ear” and to determine prevalence rates by age, gender and geographic area (Lipton et al., 1993).
Quantifying risks of developing morbidity as a function of host, agent and environmental factors.A study examining whether age, gender, depression and number of other pain conditions at baseline predict the onset of TMD pain over a 3-year period among persons in a population sample (Von Korff et al., 1993).
Identifying and defining syndromesA study examining whether risk factors are similar of different for persons with: a) myofascial pain only, b) myofascial pain plus arthralgia, and c) arthralgia only (Huang et al., 2002).
Describing the full clinical spectrum of diseaseA study comparing examination findings in people who seek treatment for TMD, those who have TMD pain but are not seeking treatment and controls (Dworkin, et al., 1990a).
Describing the natural history of disease in terms of onset, duration, recurrence, complications, disability and mortalityA study reporting the rate of onset (and offset) of TMD pain on active opening or lateral and forward movement of the lower jaw in a population of adolescent girls over a 5-year period (Kitai, et al., 1997).
Identifying factors that influence or predict clinical courseA longitudinal study of baseline predictors of myofascial pain at 1-, 3- and 5-year follow up (Rammelsberg, et al., 2003).
Identifying causes of disease, disability and mortalityA study examining the rate of use of hormone replacement therapy in women over 40 years of age with and without TMD (LeResche, et al., 1997).
Evaluating methods of disease prevention and controlA randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of a structured program of self care for reducing ongoing pain and muscle palpation pain in patients with TMD pain and low life interference (Dworkin et al., 2002a).

Although an epidemiologic study can address more than one of these issues, i.e. can be useful in multiple ways, it is important to keep in mind the primary purpose when designing a study. Is the main purpose to enumerate cases and identify treatment needs in order to set national health care priorities, or is the primary aim to study the etiology of the condition? These two purposes could result in very different study designs (see Section 4.0, Choosing an Appropriate Study Design).

 

Page 8 of 44
      Previous Section