Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

 

Temporomandibular Disorders
Author Bios
Introduction
Epidemiology
Currently selected section: Population Perspective
Developmental Perspective
Ecological Perspective
Epidemiologic Measures
Defining a Case
Pain Location
Pain Frequency, Duration and Severity
Recency of Pain
Ambient Pain or Pain on Function?
Clinical Signs and Symptoms
Currently selected section: Pain Impact/Disability
Co-morbidity
Choosing an Appropriate Design
Cross-sectional Surveys
Longitudinal Studies
Case-control Studies
Prospective Designs
Preventive and Clinical Trials
Clinical Epidemiology
Practical Considerations
Sample Size
Standardizing Data Collection
Response Burden
Summary

 

Chapter 26: Studying the Epidemiology of Temporomanibular Disorders: Pain Impact/Disability
        

In contrast to studies that classify persons with TMD pain purely on the basis of their physical signs and symptoms, it is possible to classify cases based on the degree or pattern of their pain-related disability.

For example, based on their responses to the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (Kerns et al., 1985), TMD pain patients (as well as persons with other chronic pain conditions) can be divided into groups described as "dysfunctional," "interpersonally distressed," or "adaptive copers" (Rudy et al., 1989; Turk and Rudy, 1990). In clinical trials, it has been found that certain types of interventions may be differentially effective for each of these groups (Turk, 1990).

The Graded Chronic Pain Scale, a measure of pain impact and disability (Von Korff et al., 1992b), has also proved useful for tailoring interventions to TMD patients based on the presence or absence of significant pain-related disability (Dworkin et al., 2002a; Dworkin et al., 2002b). In population-based studies, the Graded Chronic Pain scale can also be used, in combination with case definitions based on pain or clinical signs, for describing the impact of various pain conditions, including TMD (Cote et al., 2000; Elliott et al., 2002).

Page 18 of 44
      Previous Section