Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

Assessing Desirability of Outcome States
Author Biographies
Introduction
Common Health Status Measures
Preference-Based Measures
Direct Utility Elicitation
Issues with Utiliy Assessment
How are Utilities Used?
Utility and Health Status
Utility and Sociodemographic Factors
Computerized Utility Assessment
Catalogs of Utilities
Currently selected section: Case Studies
Conclusions

Chapter 24: Assessing Desirability of Outcome Stats: Case Studies
          

Assuming that each of the following was available, which would you choose?

You answered:

Selection AMean SF-36 scores from a study of community-dwelling geriatric patients with urinary incontinence

INCORRECT

Many, if not most, cost-effectiveness analyses are done apart from the original clinical trial that established the effectiveness of the intervention and must rely on utilities that were not collected from clinical trial participants. The task of the researcher is to obtain utilities that will map closely to the clinical trial participants. The investigator can identify the previously elicited utilities that will most closely match the population under study. The SF-36 scores for community-dwelling patients are unlikely to be generalizable to frail elders in geriatric management (and do not provide the utilities being sought). Patients with angina or dementia are specialized groups whose utilities would not particularly map to a frail population unless ADL data were also available for the study patients.

        Back to Question