Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

A Study of Insomnia and Sleep Loss
Author Bio
Introduction
Secondary Insomnia
Primary Insomnia
Measuring Insomnia
Physiological Measurements
Standard Scoring Protocols
Exercise A
Exercise B
Currently selected section: PSG Assessment
Part II
Part III
 
 
 
 


Chapter 15: Challenges to the Study of Insomnia and Sleep Loss: Calculations from PSG Assessment
        

Assuming that you want to use PSG assessment in an insomnia study, it becomes important to determine what PSG features to report descriptively or in response to an intervention. Looking at a graph such as the one featured in Exercise B, one can determine the time in bed, i.e. the total amount of time spent intending to plus actually sleeping. Also one can determine the proportion of the time spent actually sleeping. An important issue is the determination of when sleep has begun. This varies somewhat across studies, but sleep is frequently defined to begin with the first epoch (30 seconds) of non-REM stage 2 sleep. Several other variables can be calculated as well from the PSG summary data that generally have intuitively logical definitions:

  • Sleep Efficiency (SE): the proportion of time in bed actually asleep (% or fraction)
  • Fragmentation Index: the number of sleep stage changes from deeper to lighter stage or awake per hour
  • Sleep Onset Latency (SOL): the time to first sleep entry episode defined as 30 seconds of stage 2 or sometimes 1 sleep.
  • Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO): the amount of awake time after first sleep entry episode
  • Arousal Index (AI): the number of alpha wave or movement intrusions into the EEG lasting 15 sec. - expressed per hour

As can be seen, some of these physiologically measured sleep variables overlap and therefore can be compared to some of the self-reported variables (i.e. sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency).

While the manual scoring of brainwave amplitude and frequency tracings has been done for many years, it is becoming increasingly common to submit the EEG brainwave activity data to computer analysis and, more specifically, spectral or period analysis to indicate more refined and detailed sleeping brain physiology. Tools for spectral analysis commonly include non-parametric methods such as the fast Fourier transform (Cooley and Tukey, 1965) and parametric methods such as autoregressive (AR) modeling (see Drewes, 1999a). For the AR modeling, sleep EEG is divided into 5 frequency bands: delta (0.5-3.5 Hz), theta (3.5-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), sigma (12-14.5 Hz), and beta (14.5-25 Hz). For each band the power spectrum is described and the squared amplitude (power) of the different frequency components can be expressed as a function of frequency, as shown below. Power spectral analysis of the EEG has a potential advantage over traditional somnographic scoring of the EEG in that fast changes in the spectral content of the EEG not visible to the eye can be revealed.

Figure 1.9.1: Power Spectral Analysis of an EEG
Graphic depiction of power spectral analysis of an EEG, described in text.
Reprinted by permission: Drewes AM. Pain and sleep disturbances: Clinical, experimental and methodological aspects with special reference to the fibromyalgia syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. [doctoral thesis]. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University, 1999.

 

Page 11 of 33
      Previous Section